logo
  • Home
  • Tote Boards
  • About Carl Oppedahl
  • speedtest
  • Sites that Cite our Site

When will the Board decide my patent appeal?

20th April, 2014 · oppedahl

It’s been a while since I looked at the statistics of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to try to guess when the Board might get around to deciding an appeal.  Here’s how it looks these days.

The case that got me thinking about this is one of our firm’s cases where we filed the Reply Brief on April 15, 2013.  A year has gone by and there’s some chance the client might ask what’s going on.

A first step was to see what the Board has published lately about its backlog or its rate of disposing of cases.  One gets sort of spoiled by the First Office Action Predictions from the Examining Corps, in which the Corps predicts when it might examine a particular case (as a function of the art unit and the filing date of the case).

The Board used to publish statistics, but as far as I can tell the Board discontinued this in September of 2013 (about seven months ago).  Nothing on the web page of the Board explains why seven months have passed since the last time it published anything about this.  Here is the graph that the Board published in August of 2013:

Board backlog

This graph suggests that in August of 2013, there were about 8500 cases with appeals pending that were fully briefed ten or fewer months earlier.  And it suggests that about 3800 cases had been fully briefed between eleven and thirteen months ago.  And that about 13500 cases had been fully briefed more than fourteen months ago.

Adding up these three numbers suggests that in August of 2013, there were about 25800 ex parte appeals awaiting decision by the Board.

Of course this does not tell us the number of cases awaiting decision in April of 2014.  But one may guess that roughly speaking, for each appeal that gets decided, maybe another appeal gets its reply brief filed.  If so then the number of appeals awaiting decision might still be around 25800.

The next stop for me was the Final Decisions search page.  A search for decisions in the past thirty days yielded about 640 appeals disposed of, or an average of about twenty-one dispositions per calendar day.  So at this rate the 25800 appeals might get disposed of in maybe 1230 days or about 3⅓ years.  That is to say at this rate the newest appeal might get decided in around August of 2017.

We might call that a “forward-looking” approach to guessing how long things might take.  One might also use a “backward-looking” approach.  We can look at some of the most recently decided appeals and ask how long ago the appeal brief got filed.  For my admittedly small sample, throwing out some outlying data points, the average number of days between the filing of the appeal brief and the decision by the Board was about 856 days or about 2⅓ years.  This suggests that the newest appeal might get decided in around August of 2016.

Many factors could push the actual future results up or down.  One factor is the big bolus of inter partes post-grant proceedings that have been filed in the past year or so.  These include Post Grant Reviews, Covered Business Method proceedings, Inter Partes Reviews, and Derivation Proceedings.  The Board is under pressure to decide each of these proceedings within 12 months of institution of the proceeding.  This might lead to some ex parte proceedings getting pushed to the back burner while the time-pressured proceedings get attended to.

Back to the pending appeal that got me thinking about this case.  Given that it was fully briefed about a year ago, I can thus guess that maybe the appeal in that case will get decided somewhere in the range of 1⅓ to 2⅓ years from now, that is, maybe in the range of August 2015 to August 2016.

Share this:

  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Posted in Patents |
« Design Day 2014
Intellectual property in pop culture — “Silicon Valley” on HBO »

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

  • Copyrights (19)
  • Industrial Designs (151)
    • Hague Agreement (38)
  • Office Tech (104)
  • Patents (515)
    • PCT (211)
    • Substantive law (5)
  • Trademarks (181)
    • Madrid Protocol (32)
  • Travel (12)

Archives

  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
© 2017 Carl Oppedahl
  • Home
  • Tote Boards
  • About Carl Oppedahl
  • speedtest
  • Sites that Cite our Site
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.