Recently the Director of the USPTO, Kathi Vidal, resigned from the USPTO. The Acting Director is Coke Morgan Stewart. Now comes the news that Commissioner for Patents Vaishali Udupa has resigned from the USPTO. The Acting Commissioner is Valencia Martin Wallace.
I spoke with a Patent Examiner by telephone today. It seems there has been no communication of the Commissioner’s resignation to the actual employees of the USPTO. They get to hear about such a development by reading about it in the news, or by hearing about it from a patent practitioner.
Some water softeners recharge on a predetermined schedule, but other water softeners recharge when they feel like it. If your water softener is the latter kind, then you might want to somehow get notified each time that it decides to recharge. This article describes a successful design and implementation of a system to monitor such recharging.
Agency Heads shall take all necessary steps, in coordination with the [administrator of DOGE] and to the maximum extent consistent with law, to ensure [DOGE] has full and prompt access to all unclassified agency records, software systems, and IT systems.
“Agency” is defined in a way that includes the USPTO.
So apparently the Department of Government Efficiency has, or will soon have, full access to all unclassified USPTO records, all USPTO unclassified USPTO software systems, and all USPTO unclassified IT systems.
Here is a Youtube video with a cogent analysis of publicly available information about the tragic airplane accident at National Airport this past Wednesday. The video is about fourteen minutes in length and I think for any reader it would be time well spent.
I was in Washington earlier this week to argue an ex parte patent appeal before the PTAB. The way I arrived in Washington on Tuesday was through National Airport. Yes, the same approach from the south, with a glide slope down to Runway 1. My flight was not asked to swing over to Runway 33.
My return flight from Washington was on Thursday, through Dulles.
Three days ago the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) sent a blast email to nearly all federal employees (about two million people). (See previous blog article.) It urged the employee to resign from employment by February 6, 2025. Supposedly this would relieve the employee from having to comply with return-to-work requirements, and the employee would get paid through September 30, 2025.
Now I understand that OPM has sent a followup email dated January 30, 2025, quoted above. Reading between the lines, I sense some level of desperation on the part of OPM in this followup email.
Many things puzzle me about the statements in this email message, starting with the first of the FAQs:
Q: Am I expected to work at my government job during the deferred resignation period?
A: No.
I do not see how this could be expected to happen. The OPM guidance to management does not, for example, mandate that the resigning employee would necessarily be relieved of his or her work duties. The guidance says:
Employees who accept deferred resignation should promptly have their duties re-assigned or eliminated and be placed on paid administrative leave until the end of the deferred resignation period (generally, September 30, 2025, unless the employee has elected another earlier resignation date), unless the agency head determines that it is necessary for the employee to be actively engaged in transitioning job duties, in which case employees should be placed on administrative leave as soon as those duties are transitioned.
(January 28 memo, emphasis added.) This merely says “should”, not “must”. Not only that, management might well find that the employee is actively engaged in transitioning job duties. In the USPTO, the hiring and training of a replacement patent examiner or replacement trademark examining attorney has a cycle time measured in months, not weeks or days. Any normal “transitioning” process would likely call for the resigning employee to continue doing work for many months.
We turn to the second FAQ:
Q: Am I allowed to get a second job during the deterred resignation period?
A: Absolutely! We encourage you to find a job in the private sector as soon as you would like to do so. The way to greater American prosperity is encouraging people to move from lower productivity jobs in the public sector to higher productivity jobs in the private sector.
I do not see how this could comply with ethics laws and rules. The OPM guidance says:
Q: Can employees get another job outside of their current employing agency during the period between submission of their resignation and the final resignation date?
A: Nothing in the deferred resignation letter prevents agency employees from seeking outside employment during the period from submittal of their resignation to their final resignation date. Employing agencies should assess what restrictions, if any, exist for employees who have resigned but remain employed (including on administrative leave) by their employing agency.
(January 28 memo.) It is irrelevant that the deferred resignation letter fails to address having two jobs at the same time. What is relevant is that there are ethics laws and rules forbidding (for example) a USPTO patent examiner moonlighting for an inventor who is seeking a patent from the USPTO. Similarly there are ethics laws and rules forbidding (for example) a USPTO trademark examining attorney from moonlighting for a trademark applicant who is seeking a trademark registration from the USPTO. The mere fact of the employee (perhaps) being on administrative leave makes no difference to this ethics analysis.
We turn to the fourth FAQ:
Q: Can I take an extended vacation while on administrative leave?
A: You are most welcome [to] stay at home and relax or to travel to your dream destination. Whatever you would like.
(January 28 memo.) A first puzzler is now it could happen that such an extremely important communication, sent to some two million USPTO employees, would be missing the word “to”. Surely any external communication of this significance would get looked at by a second pair of eyes before the “send” button gets clicked.
But another challenge to this FAQ is the challenge discussed above — that it is not at all clear that a resigning employee would be able to count on not having to do any work during the seven or more months that paychecks continue to be paid.
It is also unclear to me how OPM can be so confident of being able to continue to deliver paychecks in an uninterrupted fashion through September 30, 2025. It is Congress, not any administrative agency, that controls budgets. As of right now, most agencies will run out of money on March 14, 2025.
The USPTO has always tried to incentivize the trademark applicant to pick the goods/services directly from the ID Manual. The USPTO has done this by imposing a per-class penalty for choosing your own words instead of picking from the Manual. For over a decade, the per-class penalty has been $100. Continue reading “Penalty for picking your own goods/services just doubled”
As mentioned in a previous post, USPTO will be required to hand in its report detailing its plan for eliminating work-from-home within the next nine business days. I don’t envy the USPTO’s task on this. Many of us recall a song by Miley Cyrus (Wikipedia article) that says:
And we can’t stop …
And we won’t stop …
I predict that USPTO’s report, reduced to its essence, will be along the lines of:
And we can’t stop [doing work-from-home]
And we won’t stop [doing work-from-home]
Hello readers. It will be recalled (see here and here and here) that I offered readers the opportunity to pick where I should conduct the next live in-person PCT seminars. I collected responses for the past week and a half. Each respondent was asked to say what city they wanted to suggest, and was asked to say how many attendees they thought they might send to the seminar.
I have now closed the survey form. The survey received 54 responses.
At the time that I posted this survey, I figured I must be smarter than everybody else — surely I knew which two locations would turn out to be the right places to conduct the next seminars. But the two locations I was so sure of (Alexandria, VA and San Jose, CA) did not even end up in the top five positions in the ranking. Go figure. Now you can see the top-ranked cities in the survey results. Continue reading “Where the next live in-person PCT seminars should take place?”
