Skip to content

Ant-Like Persistence

Bluesky: @oppedahl.com

  • Toteboards
  • About Carl Oppedahl
  • Sites that Cite our Site
  • VOIP telephone test

Month: February 2021

Posted on February 6, 2021

I’d call that a stable router

click to enlarge

Just now I was checking the configuration of one of the routers in my firm’s network.  I was struck to see the “uptime” report.  This particular router has been up for 195 days. 

I’d call that a rock-steady router.

 

RSS feed
Subscribe to OPLF newsletter

Recent Posts

  • Three articles about home automation
  • “They’ve cut us off at the knees!” — USPTO call center employee
  • Unacceptable hold times at the USPTO Application Assistance Unit
  • USPTO fails to handle system failure well
  • USPTO’s Trademark Center is broken for logo applications

Recent Comments

  1. V El on USPTO won’t fix the missing “corrective ADS” features in Patentcenter
  2. Aaron F. on “They’ve cut us off at the knees!” — USPTO call center employee
  3. Belit on Unacceptable hold times at the USPTO Application Assistance Unit
  4. Carl on “They’ve cut us off at the knees!” — USPTO call center employee
  5. Aaron F. on “They’ve cut us off at the knees!” — USPTO call center employee

    Archives

    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014

    Categories

    • Copyrights
    • Hague Agreement
    • Industrial Designs
    • Madrid Protocol
    • non-DOCX penalty
    • Office Tech
    • Patentcenter
    • Patents
    • PCT
    • Substantive law
    • Trade Secrets
    • Trademarks
    • Travel
    • Uncategorized
    Proudly powered by WordPress