Broken links in “get your numbers in for the toteboards”

Hello readers. After comments from several people I went to look closely at my four recent posts:

Each blog article contains four important links for you to click on:

  • a link to the questionnaire where you can enter your numbers for the particular category in that particular blog post, and
  • crosslinks to the other three blog posts.

In each case the questionnaire link works fine so far as I am aware.  But until today, each place where there was a crosslink to one of the other three blog posts, the crosslink was no good.  It asked for a user ID and password instead of taking you to the desired page.

Thanks to alert readers, I have hopefully corrected the crosslinks.

Hopefully everybody will get their numbers in soon.

Two more data points on international wire transfer costs

The other day I compared the cost of sending an international bank wire using Afex or using Western Union Globalpay (WUGP).  On a ten thousand dollar wire to Switzerland, I saved seven hundred dollars for the client by using Afex instead of WUGP (blog article).  Today I did a couple more bank wires, one to Canada and another to Japan.  This blog article compares the costs. Continue reading “Two more data points on international wire transfer costs”

Get your numbers in for the 2018 US Plant Patent tote board

It’s time for the second annual US Plant Patent Toteboard.

The goal of this toteboard is to list the firms that helped clients to obtain US plant patents in 2018.  It will rank the firms according to the number of US plant patents obtained.  Respondents are asked to report only US plant patents for which the firm is listed on the front page of the granted patent.  Please respond by Thursday, March 21, 2019.

You can see the previous Toteboards here.

To send in your numbers for the 2018 US Plant Patent tote board, click here.

It is also time to report your numbers for the 2018 US Design Patent tote board and the 2018 US Utility Patent tote board and the 2018 trademark registration tote board.

Get your numbers in for the 2018 US utility patent tote board

A year ago I published the 2017 US Utility Patent Toteboard and before that, the 2016 US Utility Patent Toteboard, and a year before that the 2015 US Utility Patent Toteboard.  Now it’s time to finalize and publish the 2018 US Utility Patent toteboard.

The goal of this toteboard is to list the firms that helped clients to obtain US utility patents in 2018.  It will rank the firms according to the number of US utility patents obtained.  Respondents are asked to report only US utility patents for which the firm is listed on the front page of the granted patent.  Please respond by Thursday, March 21, 2019.

You can see the previous Toteboards here.

To respond to be listed in the US Utility Patent Tote Board, click here.

It is also time to report your numbers for the 2018 US design patent tote board and the 2018 US trademark registration tote board and the 2018 US plant patent tote board.

Get your numbers in for the 2018 US trademark registration toteboard

It’s that time of year again.  A year ago we published the 2017 US Trademark Toteboard and before that, the 2016 US Trademark Registration Tote Board and before that, the 2015 US Trademark Registration Tote Board.  Now it’s time to get your numbers in for the fourth annual US Trademark Registration Tote Board.

The goal of this toteboard is to list the firms that helped clients obtain US trademark registrations in 2018.  The toteboard seeks to list US trademark registrations granted in 2018.    The closing date for the questionnaire will be Thursday, March 21, 2019.

You can see the previous Toteboards here.

To learn more and to report your numbers for the 2018 US Trademark Registration tote board, please click here.

It is also time to report your numbers for the 2018 US Design Patent tote board and the 2018 US Utility Patent tote board and the 2018 US Plant Patent tote board.

Solving the “last mile” problem

click to enlarge

With the fast pace of technological change, one of the biggest problems has been the “last mile” problem.  High-speed internet has little difficulty reaching a node that might be a mile away from your home or office.  But that pesky “last mile” is the challenge. (For example our Westminster office is far enough from the phone company central office that DSL is not very fast.)

It’s not only Internet connectivity that suffers from the “last mile” problem.  For package delivery, in desperation Fedex devised the misnamed Smartpost, a service in which Fedex hands off your package to the Postal Service for that last mile of delivery.  And UPS devised the equally misnamed Surepost which works the same way.

So I was fascinated to be reminded of a “last mile” solution for internet access that Google proposed a few years ago, called TiSP.  The idea was that you would drop a weighted fiber-optic cable down your sewer line and it would reach an internet node.  Continue reading “Solving the “last mile” problem”