Author: Carl

Posted on

Followup to “drinking their own Champagne”

(Update:  Forty-two Patent Practitioners have written to Director Vidal about this.  See blog article.)

Readers of this blog will recall that the Board of Directors of AIPLA adopted a resolution urging the USPTO to give substantial deference in a US national-phase application to the work done earlier by the USPTO in its role as International Searching Authority and International Preliminary Examining Authority.  AIPLA then wrote a letter to the USPTO about this.  I call this (not AIPLA’s terminology!) inviting the USPTO to “drink its own Champagne”.  I blogged about this.  What happened next?

Continue reading “Followup to “drinking their own Champagne””

Posted on

Save the date — AIPLA PCT Seminars in July 2015

(See more recent blog posting with brochure and registration information.)

AIPLA has set the dates and locations for the Patent Cooperation Treaty seminars that will happen this coming July 2015.   Here they are:

  • July 20-21 (Monday and Tuesday) in San Francisco
  • July 23-24 (Thursday and Friday) in Virginia

Those who have attended AIPLA PCT Seminars in the past know that these seminars are very different from the usual “just the facts” PCT seminar.  These seminars have the benefit of spirited interaction among all of the presenters, including experienced patent practitioners from the US and from other countries.

Save the dates on your calendar.

Your blogger will be one of the presenters.

Posted on

Results are in — the 2014 US Design Patent Toteboard

Yes, the results are in.  The Ant-Like Persistence blog is delighted to be able to present the 2014 US Design Patent Toteboard.  This toteboard lists the forty-three highest ranked firms according to the number of US design patents which they obtained for clients.  One corporation also chose to respond and is listed in the toteboard.  These filers between them obtained about 24% of all of the US design patents in 2014.

You can also see corresponding toteboards for 2013 and 2012.

Posted on

Followup to “Four Consecutive Fridays”

(There is a followup posting.)

On January 26 I blogged here about the earthquake that happened on January 15, in which the Swiss Franc jumped some 30% in value.  I talked about how this earthquake affected the World Intellectual Property Organization in Geneva.  I mentioned that the legacy approach to currency exchange rate shifts entailed a time lag of as much as three or four months, a time lag that would cost WIPO some millions of dollars.  I mentioned that the various patent offices around the world, in their role as PCT Receiving Offices, might or might not choose to accommodate WIPO by implementing new fee amounts sooner.  I wrote to USPTO and to EPO to urge them to accommodate WIPO in this way.  Here’s what I heard back from those patent offices …

Continue reading “Followup to “Four Consecutive Fridays””

Posted on

Glass ¾ full — many firms have handed in their design patent numbers

Here are some of the firms which by now have sent in their US design patent numbers at this questionnaire.

  • Pearne & Gordon LLP
  • Warner Norcross & Judd LLP
  • Sughrue Mion, PLLC
  • Design IP
  • QuickPatents
  • G. White Patents
  • Babcock IP, PLLC
  • Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.
  • Banner & Witcoff
  • Jacobson Holman PLLC
  • Knobbe Martens
  • Novak Druce Connolly Bove + Quigg
  • Michael J Brown Law Office
  • RatnerPrestia
  • Brown & Michaels
  • Leason Ellis LLC
  • Saidman DesignLaw Group
  • McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd.
  • Leydig, Voit & Mayer
  • Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian, LLP
  • Andrus Intellectual Property Law, LLP
  • Rader Fishman & Grauer PLLC
  • Harness Dickey
  • Crowell & Morning LLP
  • Osha Liang LLP
  • Cantor Colburn LLP

These firms between them obtained about one-sixth of all of the US design patents that were granted in 2014.

Posted on

Firms missing from the design patent toteboard

We now have responses from more than two dozen law firms which between them have obtained about one-seventh of all of the US design patents that were granted in 2014.  Conspicuous by their absence, however, are a few well-known firms that did quite a lot of US design patent work in 2014, including the following:

  • Cantor Colburn
  • Foley & Lardner
  • Morgan Lewis
  • Birch Stewart
  • Sterne Kessler
  • Kilpatrick
  • Nixon Vanderhye
  • Finnegan Henderson
  • Christensen O’Connor
  • Ladas & Parry
  • Wolf Greenfield
  • Oblon Spivak
  • Sheridan Ross

If you know someone at one of these firms, you might drop them a note and let them know they have six days left to respond with their information.  The toteboard will close on January 31 and the rankings will be posted in early February.

Posted on

What not to do when drafting claims (lime and coconut)

In this blog post I will say a few words about what not to do when drafting claims.  First a metaphor.  Suppose the invention is the one in Harry Nilsson’s song “Coconut“.  The first draft of the proposed patent claim, prepared by your new associate, is:

1.  A method for treating a bellyache, the method carried out with respect to a lime and a coconut, the method comprising the steps of:

  • putting the lime in the coconut, and
  • drinking it all up.

Continue reading “What not to do when drafting claims (lime and coconut)”

Posted on

Free live audio program on design patent enforcement issues

cariniDesign patents are suddenly important — everybody gets that by now.  There are a handful of practitioners who were active in the design patent area long before design patents became fashionable, and Chris Carani is one of that handful.  This next Wednesday Chris will host a free of charge live audio program that you can and should attend if your schedule permits.

Continue reading “Free live audio program on design patent enforcement issues”