(Correction — I am told that both AIPLA and IPO also contacted the USPTO privately in recent weeks about this problem.)
It looks like maybe the USPTO blinked on the non-DOCX surcharge problem, at least a little. What forced the USPTO to blink was a letter from 117 patent practitioners pushing back on a December 20, 2022 Federal Register notice. The notice maintained and doubled down on January 1, 2023 as a date that all US patent filers would face a harsh choice — incur substantial risks of losses of patent rights due to the DOCX program, or pay $400 to be able to file a patent application in a way that eliminated those substantial risks. The only visible pushbacks on this December 20, 2022 FR notice were:
-
-
- the above-mentioned letter signed by 117 practitioners, and
- ceaseless personal efforts by Bradley Forrest, a partner at the Schwegman firm.
-
In this blog article I briefly describe the state of play on the DOCX program as it now appears.
Continue reading “USPTO blinked on the non-DOCX surcharge”

If you are like most folks these days, you are getting ready to install an EV charger at your home. You agonize about whether to get this brand of EV charger or that brand of EV charger. And then just as you think you figured everything out about which EV charger to purchase, you smack into a wall. The charger is available with two kinds of plug, a so-called “6-50” plug or a so-called “14-50” plug. Which variant of the EV charger should you choose? Which plug is the right one to pick?


