USPTO will not shut down

https://www.uspto.gov/uspto-operating-status

Here is what the USPTO says:

While activities across much of the federal government ceased at 12:01 a.m. January 20, 2018, due to a lack of appropriated funding, the USPTO remains operational.

This is possible because the agency has access to prior year fee collections, which enables the USPTO to continue normal operations for a few weeks. Should the USPTO exhaust these funds before a government shutdown comes to an end, the agency would have to shut down at that time, although a very small staff would continue to work to accept new applications and maintain IT infrastructure, among other functions.

Further information regarding any adjustments to the USPTO’s operating status during a federal government shutdown will be posted on the USPTO website and delivered to the news media.

Patent Prosecution Boot Camp imminent

The Nineteenth Annual AIPLA Patent Prosecution Boot Camp will take place February 7-9 in Denver.  Nowhere else will you get a faculty that includes more than three dozen extremely experienced patent practitioners, with three days of classes.  For more information, or to register, click here.

Yours truly is among the presenters at this unique program.

 

Why have you not registered for this CLE webinar?

Suzannah K. Sundby

Tuesday, January 9 there will be a webinar about sequence listings.  The webinar is free of charge. This webinar will be presented by two experienced practitioners, Suzannah K. Sundby and Carl Oppedahl.

As of right now, the number of people who have signed up for this webinar is less than the number of people in the world.  This might mean that you have not signed up for this webinar.  Which then raises the question:

Why have you not signed up for this webinar?

For more information, or to register for this free webinar about sequence listings, click here.

Carl Oppedahl

If you know someone who might want to attend this free webinar about sequence listings, you will probably be doing them a favor if you pass this information on to them.

 

Abstract is required to “commence on a separate sheet”? No!

From time to time an Examiner in the USPTO recites this objection:

The abstract of the disclosure does not commence on a separate sheet in accordance with 37 CFR §§ 1.52(b)(4) and 1.72(b).  A new abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text.

An Examiner made such an objection a couple of days ago in one of our cases.  We will be able to force the Examiner to withdraw the objection. Continue reading “Abstract is required to “commence on a separate sheet”? No!”

USPTO favors a particular company

click to enlarge

The USPTO did a bad thing the other day.  It told its customers, falsely, that the only way to do time-based one-time passwords is to use Oracle’s app.  USPTO says “you must have the Oracle Mobile Authenticator app on your mobile device” to do one-time passwords.  This is flatly false and it wrongly favors a particular company.  Hopefully the USPTO will remedy its mistake immediately.  I’ll explain this.   Continue reading “USPTO favors a particular company”

A new Best Practice – reporting docx

A year ago or so, the USPTO started a beta-test of its system in which docx files play an important role.  In the best-test system, an applicant was permitted to file a patent application in docx format rather than PDF format.  Likewise, the applicant had the opportunity to receive some documents from the USPTO in docx format in addition to PDF format.  Our firm was among the beta-testers of this docx system.

Now, as of September 10, 2017, these features have been made available to all USPTO customers (not merely the beta-test users).  This offers a new Best Practice for reporting to clients.

Continue reading “A new Best Practice – reporting docx”