Fairly urgent to-do items for the designers of Financial Manager

In April of 2016, USPTO launched its FM (Financial Manager) system with a modest feature set, namely it could be used for paying patent maintenance fees.  I blogged about this here.  The FM system was intended to be a successor to (and an abrupt replacement for) the Financial Profile (FP) system that USPTO customers had known and loved for many years.

A week later, USPTO extended the reach of FM to TEAS.  By this is meant that a TEAS user who reached the point of having to pay money would encounter the FM page instead of the familiar RAM page for paying the fee.  I blogged about this TEAS development here.

Within days of the launch of FM, it became clear to users that (a) USPTO had not been completely successful at bringing all features of FP forward into FM and (b) the feature set of FM had not been thought through very well.

Now within the past couple of weeks, the territory-creep of FM has gotten much broader.  It extends to OEMS (the system for ordering certified copies of things) and to EFS-Web.  USPTO intends that very soon, every USPTO e-commerce system that involves user payments will be migrated to the FM system.

So what are some of the missing features of FM?

For example suppose you are an FM administrator for your firm or company.  Suppose that today you hired a new employee and you need to get that employee connected to FM so that the employee can use your various payment mechanisms to pay fees to the USPTO.  Depending on the number of payment mechanisms that you have set up in FM, it might take anywhere from many dozens of mouse clicks to several hundred mouse clicks to get that employee fully connected to FM.

Of course the way it should work is this:

I log in to FM and I paste in the user ID of a new user.  And then I click on “add payment mechanism privileges” or some such.  And it brings up a list of all of the payment payment mechanisms for which I am an administrator.  And it lets me do a “select all” and then uncheck a few if needed.  And then all of the payment mechanisms get added to this new user.

In other words, adding a new user ought to be three or four mouse clicks instead of several hundred mouse clicks.

If USPTO had done meaningful beta testing of FM, I am quite sure that the beta users would have complained loudly about having to do several hundred mouse clicks every time a new employee is hired.  Given the absence of this feature, one is left with the sense that USPTO did very little if any beta testing of FM before rolling it out.

I suggested this feature to the FM developers two months ago.  Two months have passed and FM still does not have this feature.

Another problem area arises if as an FM administrator I add a payment method.  For example I might add a deposit account or a credit card.  The way FM works now, I certainly can add a new payment method.  But at that point, nobody at my firm or corporation can actually use the new payment method.  If I have, say, ten users in FM, it is likely to take around two hundred mouse clicks to enable each of those ten users to use the new payment method.

The alert reader will know where I am going with this.  The designers of FM should provide a feature like this:

I have just added a new payment method.  At that point, I click on “add users” or some such.  And FM brings up a list of all of the users who are connected with any of the other payment mechanisms for which I am an administrator.  And it lets me do a “select all” and then uncheck a few if needed.  And the selected users all get added to this new payment mechanism.

I suggested this to the developers of FM two months ago.  No such feature as of today.

A related feature would be a sort of “add from list”. Here is what is needed:

I add or select a payment mechanism.  And then I click on “bulk add users” or some such.  And it lets me paste in a list of users, separated by my choice of whitespace or commas or semicolons.  And the users all get added to this new payment mechanism.

The alert reader will guess what I am going to say next.  I suggested this feature to the FM developers two months ago, and it has not been implemented.

Another missing feature:

As an FM administrator I need to be able to click somewhere and generate a list of all of the authorized users in our firm or corporation.  (By this we mean a list of a list of all persons who have any privileges connected with any payment mechanisms for which I am an administrator.)  This list needs to show their user names.  (This is important because a user can change his or her user name at any time and might have changed it ten minutes ago.)  From this list it ought to be possible to click on a particular user to see a sub-page detailing the payment methods for which that person is authorized.

FM lacks this feature despite the feature having been suggested two months ago.

A related missing feature is this.  I am an FM administrator.  I need to be able to click on the name of one of our users, and bring up a list of the payment methods for which that user is authorized.

As things now stand there is no way to do anything resembling this except by doing several hundred mouse clicks through all of one’s payment methods.

Yet another missing feature is this.  Suppose an employee suddenly becomes an ex-employee.  For example suppose someone gets fired.  It would be helpful if I, as an FM administrator, could click on a user list to select that user.  And then if I could click on a button that simply cancels that user’s permissions to use all payment methods.

As things now stand in FM, the cancellation of all payment method permissions for a newly fired employee would take at least a few dozen mouse clicks and for some offices it would be several hundred mouse clicks.

What features would you like to see in USPTO’s Financial Manager system?  Please post a comment about this.

Bad experience with Financial Manager

The other day I sent a Section 71 document (a ten-year trademark renewal document) by means of the TEAS system to a foreign client for e-signature.  The next day the TEAS system reported that the document had been e-signed.  All that remained was for me to pay the $100 government fee.  I figured this would be easy.  I figured wrong.  The Financial Manager system made it very difficult.  The Financial Manager system locked my account and it was a lot of trouble getting things working again.  Here are the details: Continue reading “Bad experience with Financial Manager”

Comments are in on proposed TTAB rules

June 3 was the last date on which a would-be commenter could comment upon the TTAB’s proposed rules published April 4, 2016.  I am pleased to be able to report that the E-Trademarks Listserv (ETL) was among the commenters.  Other commenters included “the big four”, that is, IPO, ABA-IPL, INTA, and AIPLA.   You can see all sixteen comments here.  The ETL comments focused on three issues:

  • whether it is a good idea for the TTAB to once again resume responsibility for carrying out service of process (a responsibility that had been shifted to the plaintiff in 2007);
  • TTAB’s proposed requirement that the plaintiff figure out what email address the TTAB should use when carrying out service of process via email;  and
  • TTAB’s proposed limiting the number of Requests to Admit to 75.

I’ll summarize the positions taken by the various commenters on these three issues. Continue reading “Comments are in on proposed TTAB rules”

The background music in the Nashville airport

A couple of weeks ago I had the honor of teaching a class at the annual meeting of the Tennessee Intellectual Property Law Association.  It was a delightful time.  The Association members made me feel welcome and the class went well.  (I spoke about best practices for use of the Patent Cooperation Treaty.)  But that’s not the point of today’s post.  The point of today’s post is to comment on the background music in the Nashville airport. Continue reading “The background music in the Nashville airport”

Please attend the OPLF reception in Orlando

Will you be in Orlando, Florida at the time of the 2016 meeting of INTA (the International Tbbking-logorademark Association)?  Are you a member of the E-Trademarks Listserv?  Are you with a trademark or patent firm located outside of the US? Or are you with a corporation?  If so, we hope you will join the people of Oppedahl Patent Law Firm LLC at our reception for the E-Trademarks Listserv.  Our reception will take place at B B King’s Blues Club from 5PM to 8PM on Tuesday, May 24.

To learn more abut the reception, and to RSVP, please click here.

Post-reg astonishingly fast all of a sudden

A few months ago, trademark practitioners were comparing experiences with backlogs at “post-reg”.  By this we mean the branch of the USPTO that handles papers filed after a trademark has registered.  (The forum in which they discussed these backlogs is the E-trademarks listserv.)  As of a few months ago, they were seeing backlogs in the range of 2-3 months.  But recently things seem to have improved drastically. Continue reading “Post-reg astonishingly fast all of a sudden”

New Financial Manager system connects with more and more USPTO e-commerce systems

USPTO launched its “Financial Manager” system about two weeks ago.  (At the same time, USPTO permanently shut down the wonderful “Financial Profile” system that had served users well for many years.)

When the Financial Manager (“FM”) system launched two weeks ago, it was connected with one e-commerce system, namely the system for paying patent maintenance fees.  I blogged about the new maintenance fee payment system here.

Today the USPTO connected its new FM system to TEAS, the e-filing system for trademark application. I blogged about this new connection here.

This means that trademark filers no longer have to key in an entire credit card number when paying a fee. The filer can simply select the card from a drop-down list of stored payment mechanisms.

Today the USPTO also connected its new FM system to the online ordering system of the Office of Public Records. This ordering system, with the catchy name “OEMS”, now likewise permits you to select a payment mechanism from a stored list. This saves you having to key in detailed credit card information when placing such orders.

I have heard that in about a week, USPTO plans to connect FM to the EFS-Web system.

It’s clear from these developments that we all need to get familiar with FM. Presumably you configured your FM user accounts two weeks ago. But if you have not done so yet, you can visit the Financial Manager setup page to set things up.

Have you used FM?  Please post a comment below to let readers know how it went for you.

Now trademark filers don’t need to key in credit card numbers

fm-tmIf, like me, you sometimes use a credit card to pay fees when filing a US trademark application, then you are accustomed to having to key in a sixteen-digit credit card number to pay the filing fee.  Indeed you are accustomed to having to key in six categories of information — the credit card number, the expiration date, the CCV code, the cardholder name, the billing address, and the billing Zip code.

But as of today, you can skip all of that.  You can use USPTO’s new Financial Manager (FM) system to store payment methods.  When you do this (see screen shot at right), you can choose “stored payment method”.  Then you select a stored payment method from a drop-down list.  In this case I selected a Visa card.  Then you key in the card security code and click “submit”.

This saves you having to key in five of the six categories of information mentioned above.

If you have not stored any payment methods in FM, then you can still proceed in the old-fashioned way, choosing “credit/debit card” and hand-keying the six categories of information.

In an office having high rates of employee turnover, this system will permit an employee to pay a trademark fee without the need to provide the actual credit card number or expiration date to the employee.

The FM system has been available for two weeks now.  Presumably you configured your FM user accounts two weeks ago.  But if you have not done so yet, you can visit the Financial Manager setup page to set things up.

Have you successfully paid a trademark fee using this new “stored payment” method?  If so, please post a comment below and let me know how it went.

Conspicuous by its absence in the new USPTO Financial Manager system

us-loginA week ago USPTO launched its new Financial Manager system.  A core component of this FM system is The New USPTO.gov Account system.  As explained on the USPTO web site, The New USPTO.gov Account system “will one day be your single means of accessing USPTO services and applications”.  In other words, it will be a successor to the present-day system of logging in at EFS-Web and Private PAIR.timeout2

Unfortunately, the designers of the new USPTO FM system (who I guess are the same as the designers of The New USPTO.gov Account system) failed to follow through on a promise that the USPTO made back in 2012.  I’m talking about a promise to let the customer pick how much time would pass before the customer would get forced into a logout from the system.

Continue reading “Conspicuous by its absence in the new USPTO Financial Manager system”