WIPO recently released a new version of ePCT and it has many changes that are helpful for applicants. Now WIPO will be offering a webinar that reviews and explains some of those changes.
Every user of the PCT system ought to attend. Continue reading “Attend this webinar for PCT enthusiasts”
The executive summary for this blog article is that ethernet is faster than 5-gigahertz wifi, and 5-gigahertz wifi is faster than 2.4-gigahertz wifi. (I imagine that most readers of this blog already expected this to be the case.) Continue reading “Choosing a LAN type”
It is recalled that one of the requirements for Patentcenter is that it is supposed to replicate the functions of Private PAIR. Only after this replication is complete would USPTO be entitled to pull the plug on Private PAIR.
The latest lapse, reported by alert listserv member Jill Santuccio, is in the metadata that Patentcenter uses when providing a multi-document download from IFW. Continue reading “Yet another Patencenter lapse – metadata failing to match Private PAIR”
As some readers know, the USPTO plans eventually to pull the plug on EFS-Web and Private PAIR, leaving only Patentcenter as the way for USPTO customers to carry out the functions that have in the past been carried out in EFS-Web and Private PAIR. There are, however, many bugs in Patentcenter. And there are many features that ought to have been implemented in Patentcenter but have not yet been implemented. You can see some of the bugs and missing features listed here. These lists are the result of the hard work of the members of the Patentcenter listserv (learn how to join). Most of the items on the lists are by now more than two years old.
I am delighted to report that our listserv has managed to secure a meeting with Jamie Holcombe, the Chief Information Officer at the USPTO, to discuss some of the outstanding bugs and missing features. Continue reading “An upcoming USPTO meeting about Patentcenter”
One of the expressly stated goals for the USPTO developers developing Patentcenter is that every feature and function of EFS-Web and Private PAIR be carried forward into Patentcenter. Only after this has been accomplished would it be acceptable for the USPTO to pull the plug on EFS-Web or Private PAIR. Unfortunately, users of Patentcenter frequently encounter situations where some feature of EFS-Web or Private PAIR has been only incompletely carried forward. This article describes a failure of the developers to fully carry forward all of the features of the Track I workflow. This harms applicants, as I will describe in some detail. Continue reading “A feature omission in Patentcenter – Track I fees”
It turns out that anybody who wants to, can publish things on SSRN (Wikipedia article). SSRN, it will be recalled, is an initialism for Social Science Research Network (web site). To test this out, I created an account at SSRN and uploaded The Fool’s Errand that is DOCX. You can see it here: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4346907. This blog article describes the process and the results. Continue reading “Publishing things on SSRN!”
(An important followup letter got sent on February 14, 2023 to the USPTO — see blog article.)
Readers, I am delighted to be able to report what looks like a bit of progress by the USPTO, away from some of the bad parts of its DOCX initiative. A meeting took place on February 1, 2023 with some representatives of the patent practitioner listserv committee. You can read about the meeting below. Continue reading “Maybe some USPTO progress away from bad parts of its DOCX initiative”
Folks, the subject line says it all. When I am assembling a plastic model kit, should I glue the parts together, and then paint the parts? Or (as the instructions seem to suggest) should I paint the parts first, and then glue them together? Continue reading “Paint first or glue first?”
Hello readers. You will recall (blog article of December 27, 2022) that the practitioner community was invited to sign a letter to USPTO Director Vidal. The letter urged her to read the document entitled The Fool’s Errand That Is DOCX, dated December 27, 2022, and the letter urged her to direct her underlings to read that document.
I am honored to be part of a community of eighty-two patent practitioners who signed that letter to Director Vidal.
This blog article reports that the letter did get sent to the USPTO. You can see the letter, which is dated December 28, 2022, here. The USPTO did receive the letter.
The next day, the USPTO blinked and postponed for another three months one of the really bad parts of its DOCX initiative. See Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees During Fiscal Year 2020, 87 Federal Register 80073, published December 29, 2022.
There is reason to think that the USPTO is moving, albeit slowly, toward yet another bit of progress away from really bad parts of its DOCX initiative, in addition to that blink on December 29, 2022. I hope to write another blog article soon about what might be another bit of progress.
Please take a look at the names of the eighty-two signers. Maybe you know some of them. If so, this might be a good time to say “thank you” to them.
(Update: the appellant’s reply brief has now been filed – blog article.)
Hello folks. It will be recalled that the Commissioner for Trademarks has shown an extremely strong interest in knowing where you sleep at night, if you happen to be an applicant in a trademark application. And in a brief filed yesterday at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the Commissioner has now doubled down on demanding to know where you sleep at night. Continue reading “USPTO doubles down on demanding to know where you sleep at night”
