Yes it’s another snow day at the Patent Office.
What caption to use when responding to a patent Office Action?
Most of us, when we were learning how to prepare a response to a patent Office Action in the USPTO, were taught to load up the caption with every conceivable piece of information. When I was first in practice I was taught to provide not only the application number but also the art unit, the Examiner’s name, the filing date, and the title of the invention. Some years later the USPTO introduced the “confirmation number” and this, too, went into the caption. Now I skip all of this and I use the application number and nothing else in the caption. Why?
Continue reading “What caption to use when responding to a patent Office Action?”
Why it’s a bad idea to generally authorize charges to your Deposit Account
There’s a fascinating thread over at the EFS-Web listserv today, about general authorizations to charge USPTO Deposit Accounts. As I will discuss in this blog post, I think that nowadays it is unwise to give a general-authorization-to-charge to the USPTO in a patent application.
Continue reading “Why it’s a bad idea to generally authorize charges to your Deposit Account”
Closure on changes in PCT fees (was “Four Fridays”)
Readers will recall my January 26 posting and my February 4 posting about the consequences of the decision on January 15 by the Swiss central bank to allow the Swiss Franc to rise to its natural level after over a year during which the bank had sought to cap the percentage difference between the Swiss Franc and the Euro. The Swiss Franc jumped 15 to 20 to 30 percent relative to various other currencies. I predicted that the International Bureau would seek to revise the “equivalent amounts” for the PCT international filing fee and other PCT fees payable to the International Bureau and would seek to make the revised fees effective much sooner than the usual delay of 3-4 months. Now the new fees have been set and indeed they will take effect sooner than the usual delay.
Continue reading “Closure on changes in PCT fees (was “Four Fridays”)”
USPTO will be closed on Tuesday, February 17
The weather reports for the Washington area call for “six to ten inches of snow” between now and noon on Tuesday. So the USPTO will be formally closed on Tuesday, February 17. This means that if you needed to file something on the 17th to satisfy some USPTO due date, it will be timely if filed on Wednesday the 18th.
Continue reading “USPTO will be closed on Tuesday, February 17”
USPTO closed Monday February 16
Just a reminder that the USPTO will be closed on Monday, February 16. This is Washington’s Birthday* which is a federal holiday.
Anything that you might need to do by February 16 to satisfy some USPTO due date may be postponed until Tuesday, February 17 and will still be timely.
Helpful webinars about ePCT
Almost daily I will encounter some patent practitioner or patent firm or corporate patent department that uses PCT but that fails to make use of ePCT. Of course when this happens I encourage the patent practitioner or patent firm or corporate patent department to start using ePCT. I imagine this to be a bit like the dentist who encourages people to brush and floss, sometimes feeling discouraged with the realization that some will not follow the advice. Now comes another series of webinars from WIPO explaining how to use ePCT.
Followup to “PPH Petition Backlog – four months and counting”
(Followup posting here.)
Within our office we try to track our PPH cases pretty carefully. This prompted my recent blog postings here and here and here about the recent substantial worsening of the backlog within the USPTO in considering requests for PPH status. After months of no progress USPTO has managed to grant a few of our long-pending PPH petitions, and so we have some hard data as just now bad the backlog is in recent weeks.
Continue reading “Followup to “PPH Petition Backlog – four months and counting””
Followup to “drinking their own Champagne”
(Update: Forty-two Patent Practitioners have written to Director Vidal about this. See blog article.)
Readers of this blog will recall that the Board of Directors of AIPLA adopted a resolution urging the USPTO to give substantial deference in a US national-phase application to the work done earlier by the USPTO in its role as International Searching Authority and International Preliminary Examining Authority. AIPLA then wrote a letter to the USPTO about this. I call this (not AIPLA’s terminology!) inviting the USPTO to “drink its own Champagne”. I blogged about this. What happened next?
Continue reading “Followup to “drinking their own Champagne””
Save the date — AIPLA PCT Seminars in July 2015
(See more recent blog posting with brochure and registration information.)
AIPLA has set the dates and locations for the Patent Cooperation Treaty seminars that will happen this coming July 2015. Here they are:
- July 20-21 (Monday and Tuesday) in San Francisco
- July 23-24 (Thursday and Friday) in Virginia
Those who have attended AIPLA PCT Seminars in the past know that these seminars are very different from the usual “just the facts” PCT seminar. These seminars have the benefit of spirited interaction among all of the presenters, including experienced patent practitioners from the US and from other countries.
Save the dates on your calendar.
Your blogger will be one of the presenters.