Aberrant reel and frame numbers in Patentcenter

click to enlarge

Recently the USPTO opened up access to Patentcenter to all users.  (Previously it was open only to certain alpha and beta testers.)  This prompted me to set up a new listserv for Patentcenter users (to learn more or to subscribe, click here).  Alert listserv member Shannon Vieau raised a fascinating issue namely that the reel and frame numbers listed for recorded assignments in Patentcenter often do not match those listed for recorded assignments in PAIR.  Prompted by her listserv posting (thank you!) I looked up one of our cases where in PAIR it says what you see above.

click to enlarge

Meanwhile in Patentcenter it says what you see at right.  Yeah.  The frame number is the same in the two places — 366.  But in PAIR the reel number is 048299 while in Patentcenter the reel number is 17237.  One of them is clearly wrong.

Which one is correct?  The answer is, Patentcenter is wrong.  PAIR is correct.  Shannon reported this to the EBC today.  It will be interesting to see how long it takes for this to get fixed.

Can’t claim priority in Patentcenter?

(Update:  I am astonished and disappointed to see that the USPTO developers made this exact same mistake four years later, in Trademark Center.  See blog article.)

(Update:  it took more than six months from when we reported the bug, but USPTO did finally fix it.  See blog article.)

When you are e-filing a new utility patent application in EFS-Web, one of the ways to make the priority claim is by means of a web-based Application Data Sheet.  There’s a place in EFS-Web where you can say that you are adding a priority claim, and it gives you a drop-down menu of patent offices where your priority application might have been filed.

USPTO has had users alpha-testing and beta-testing its new system called Patentcenter, which will eventually replace EFS-Web.  Patentcenter has a similar web-based ADS function that allows you to make a priority claim when you are filing a new patent application.  When you use this function, eventually you reach this drop-down menu of patent offices where your priority application might have been filed.  Can you guess which well-known foreign patent office is missing from this drop-down list in Patentcenter? Continue reading “Can’t claim priority in Patentcenter?”

Patentcenter creates and loads color and gray scale into IFW

click to enlarge

New users of Patentcenter will learn soon enough that there is a way that Patentcenter breaks USPTO’s own rules.

If there’s anything that patent practitioners learn the hard way, it is that the USPTO systems ruin any PDF that contains color or gray scale when the PDF gets loaded into IFW.  I documented this back in 2006 as you can see here.  USPTO recognized this (EFS-Web guidelines) at least as long ago as 2008:

Text of other colors [other than black] may not convert to image properly, resulting in unreadable or invisible text.

So imagine how disappointing it is to see that the designers of Patentcenter have set it up so that every single form generated by Patentcenter for loading into IFW is filled with color and gray scale!  Which violates USPTO’s own rules for images to be e-filed in IFW. Continue reading “Patentcenter creates and loads color and gray scale into IFW”

US trademark filings are way down

Alert blog reader Michael Zall drew my attention to the following numbers which are easy to pull from the TESS database on the web site of the USPTO.  The table shows year-on-year comparisons for new US trademark filings during particular date ranges.  Compare March 2020 with March 2019, for example, and the number of new US trademark filings is down 14%.

  Jan 1 to April 15 March 1 to March 31
2019 140753 43911
2020 126502 37608
percent drop 10% 14%

This observed drop is consistent with some slides that the USPTO trademark management presented to the Trademark Public Advisory Committee last Friday, as I will now discuss.  Continue reading “US trademark filings are way down”

How many design applications have been filed in Patentcenter?

click to enlarge

The alpha testing of Patentcenter began in about August of 2018.  My firm was among the first of the alpha testers of Patentcenter.   The other day I realized that it’s easy to figure out how much of the testing my firm has done.  I was fascinated to see that my firm has filed about half of all of the design applications that anybody has filed in Patentcenter.  Continue reading “How many design applications have been filed in Patentcenter?”

USPTO opens Patentcenter to all filers

click to enlarge

Until now, only certain filers were able to gain access to USPTO’s Patentcenter system.  To gain access, the filer had to be visiting from an IP address on a particular approved list.

Starting yesterday, April 20, 2020, the USPTO removed the IP address restrictions.  Now anybody can reach the Patentcenter web site.

To reach Patentcenter, go to this web page:  https://patentcenter.uspto.gov/.

What is Patentcenter?  Why do you care? Continue reading “USPTO opens Patentcenter to all filers”

How the USPTO should do DOCX (pre-conversion format)

click to enlarge

Today I am working on getting ready to file a PCT patent application and I am filing it in DOCX and it reminds me how wrong-headed USPTO’s approach is.  Folks, if you have not filed DOCX at the RO/IB, I invite you to try it so that you can see that there is a correct way to do DOCX.  It’s just that the USPTO does not do it that way. Continue reading “How the USPTO should do DOCX (pre-conversion format)”

A better videoconferencing approach than Zoom

These days everybody seems to use Zoom for videoconferencing.   But it is all over the news that Zoom has many privacy issues and security issues.  This has prompted tech writers to write articles such as The best alternatives to Zoom for videoconferencing.  Some of the alternatives cost a lot of money.  One of them requires that everyone be using Apple products.  One of them works only for two participants.  Most of the services pass the video and audio streams through a server controlled by the service provider and you do not know who might be eavesdropping on the streams.

And then there’s Jitsi, which is what I recommend.  Jitsi is open-source, and it is encrypted, and you can host it yourself.  Our firm recently set up our own Jitsi server.  So we can host our own Jitsi videoconferences at a cost per minute of zero and a cost per month of zero, and the connections are about as secure as any videoconference could possibly be.  But even if you use the public Jitsi server (“Jitsi Meet“), you are still far better off in terms of privacy and security than if you were to use Zoom.

Have you used Jitsi?  Would you like to try out our firm’s Jitsi server?  Please post a comment below.