Today is the day – US design applications that claim priority from Chinese design applications

Today is the day that USPTO is pulling the plug on the PDX system with respect to the Chinese patent office.  As a consequence, today is the day that, for the first time, a US design applicant can use the DAS system to obtain an electronic certified copy of a Chinese priority design application.

I blogged about this a few days ago, and you can read more about this development in that blog article.

As of today, for a US design filer, the DAS system makes it possible to retrieve an electronic certified copy of a priority application from the following Offices:

  • China
  • Spain
  • India

Korea became a Depositing Office for designs on July 20, 2018 (blog article).  But this is no help for US design filers who wish to claim priority from a Korean design application.  Hopefully soon the USPTO will pull the plug on the PDX connection to the Korean intellectual property office, and then US design filers will be able to make use of DAS for Korean priority claims.

KIPO recently became a Depositing Office in DAS for designs

There was a development in the industrial design community last month that almost went unnoticed.  On July 20, 2018, the Korean Intellectual Property Office became a Depositing Office in the DAS system for designs.

This is unfortunately no help for US design filers who wish to claim priority from a Korean priority application, because as of right now, the USPTO and the KIPO are still connected in PDX.  And PDX trumps DAS.  Hopefully Real Soon Now the USPTO will pull the plug on the PDX connection to KIPO, and then US design filers will be able to use DAS to get electronic certified copies of Korean design applications.

The ID5 Offices that have not yet joined DAS

The ID5 is the big five Offices for protection of industrial designs.  The Offices are the USPTO, the EUIPO (formerly known as OHIM), JPO (the Japanese patent office), KIPO (the Korean intellectual property office) and SIPO (the Chinese patent office).

Conspicuous by its absence from DAS is EUIPO.  I keep hearing that EUIPO will join DAS Real Soon Now.  I do hope that EUIPO will follow through with this.

USPTO is not, at the present time, a Depositing Office in DAS for design applications.  USPTO has promised that Real Soon Now it will become a Depositing Office for designs.  I do hope that USPTO will follow through with this.

JPO is not, at the present time, a Depositing Office in DAS for design applications.  I also hope that JPO will follow through soon with this.

Why would anyone convert a US provisional application to a non-provisional?

There is a procedure for converting a US provisional patent application into a non-provisional patent application.  The practitioner who follows this procedure (instead of simply filing a non-provisional with a domestic benefit claim) will put the client in the position of incurring an extra government fee and losing some patent term.

So why would anyone ever carry out this procedure?  There is a real-life situation where this might be the clever thing to do, as I learned the other day from a smart member of the EFS-Web listserv.

Continue reading “Why would anyone convert a US provisional application to a non-provisional?”