Category: Patents

Posted on

Patentcenter fails to tell you what application you are filing in

click to enlarge

One category of recurring task in any e-filing system is what might be termed a “follow-on submission” or a “subsequently filed document”.  With such a task, you somehow indicate the application number of the application in which you wish to file your document.  Clearly one of the most important user interface goals is to help the user avoid an undesired result of inadvertently filing a document in the wrong application.   EFS-Web gets this right.  WIPO’s ePCT system gets this right.  But Patentcenter fails, as may be seen from the screen shot at right.  Continue reading “Patentcenter fails to tell you what application you are filing in”

Posted on

Is it important to record assignments in divisional and continuation cases?

Assume for sake of discussion that a properly worded assignment has been executed and recorded for a US patent application.  By this we mean an assignment that indeed settles ownership of of the subject matter of that patent application to the named applicant (typically a corporation or other legal entity that to which the inventors were obligated to assign the invention).  Now assume that a continuation or divisional application gets filed pursuant to 35 USC § 120 (in this discussion I do not mean to assume a continuation-in-part).  The question posed is:

Is it important, or even necessary, to record the assignment with respect to the child case?

In this blog article I will discuss factors that I can think of that might influence an applicant’s decision as to whether or not to go to the trouble of recording the assignment in the child case.  I hope you, dear reader, will consider this question, and I hope you will post a comment below with your thoughts about this.  Continue reading “Is it important to record assignments in divisional and continuation cases?”

Posted on

USPTO gets it right sometimes — disclosures from parent case

Every now and then I am astonished to see the USPTO getting something right.  Here is an example of the USPTO getting something right — what it amounts to is that I filed a divisional patent application and the USPTO filed for me the IDS that I was getting ready to file.  Yes, of course normally when one files a continuation or divisional application, one faces the tedious task of preparing an IDS in the child case to disclose all of the references from the parent case.  Here, oversimplifying it slightly, I have a case where the USPTO filed that child-case IDS for me.  I won’t have to prepare and file that IDS.  You might wonder, what’s going on here?  You might wonder, why is the USPTO doing my work for me?  If you wonder these things, then read on. Continue reading “USPTO gets it right sometimes — disclosures from parent case”

Posted on

How to overcome the login defects in Patentcenter

click to enlarge

It can be very difficult to log in at Patentcenter, which is the system that USPTO intends will replace Private PAIR and EFS-Web.  Given that USPTO plans to shut down both Private PAIR and EFS-Web in the near future, what follows from this is that the USPTO needs to fix the many design flaws and software bugs in Patentcenter.  Many of the flaws and bugs in Patentcenter have been outstanding since its alpha-test launch more than two years ago, and have not been fixed even after more than two years.  Today’s blog article talks about a trick that often helps with the login defects in Patentcenter. Continue reading “How to overcome the login defects in Patentcenter”

Posted on

Upcoming webinars for sequence listing enthusiasts

There are two upcoming webinars for those who frequently work with sequence listings:

  • WIPO Sequence Validator.  May 12, 2021 at 4 AM Mountain Time.  Duration, 90 minutes.  To register, click here. 
  • WIPO ST.26: Advanced.  May 19, 2021 at 5 AM Mountain Time.  Duration:  90 minutes.  To register, click here. 
Posted on

Upcoming webinar: Understanding PCT incorporation by reference

US practitioners toss the phrase “incorporation by reference” into patent applications as a matter of routine.  But in the world of the Patent Cooperation Treaty, and in many designated Offices in which one might enter the national or regional phase from a PCT application, there are only very limited circumstances in which an applicant can rely upon incorporation by reference.  

Attend this webinar, presented by WIPO, to learn just what the limited circumstances are in which a PCT applicant may rely upon incorporation by reference.  The presenters will be Matthias Reischle-Park, Deputy Director and Hanna Kang, Legal Officer, PCT Legal and User Relations Division.  Continue reading “Upcoming webinar: Understanding PCT incorporation by reference”

Posted on

Sign up for a webinar on ePCT

WIPO will be providing a two-hour overview of ePCT and its functionalities. Attendees will be shown how to do several important things, including:

  • how to file PCT applications online,
  • how to perform online Actions,
  • how to share access rights, and
  • how to best manage applications by using the many practical features offered by ePCT.

The speakers will be Viviane Gross, Head, PCT eServices, and Pascal Piriou, Customer Service Assistant. Continue reading “Sign up for a webinar on ePCT”

Posted on

A new listserv for ST.26 users

For many years, those who e-file genetic sequence listings have prepared and filed the listings using a standard called ST.25.  A successor standard fetchingly named ST.26 has been agreed upon by all of the patent offices of the world.  It is XML-based.  A software tool has been developed by WIPO which users can use to create, edit, and verify ST.26 sequence listings.  

I have set up a new listserv named ST26@oppedahl-lists.com for email discussions relating to the use of ST.26.  This listserv will chiefly be of interest to those who work with sequence listings when they file patent applications. 

This listserv joins the many other intellectual-property related listservs hosted by OPLF, for example for trademark practitioners, for users of the Patent Cooperation Treaty, for users of USPTO’s Patentcenter, for users of the Madrid Protocol, for protection of industrial designs, and for protection of copyrights.

To find out more about the new ST.26 listserv or to subscribe to the ST.26 listserv, click here.

Posted on

EPO webinar on PCT for US filers

On April 29th the European Patent Office (EPO), is offering a 1½-hour online seminar dedicated to the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).  This will be at 10AM Mountain Time.

This seminar is an opportunity to find out more about the services provided by the EPO and the latest developments in the PCT system:

  • PCT procedure before the EPO as International Authority
  • New PCT Rules (as of 1 July 2020)
  • Online filing possibilities
  • Register Alert, Mailbox, ePCT
  • Payments and Reimbursement

Only 400 seats are available for this program, which is free of charge.  Register now to reserve your place!