
Get rid of or correct or improve the “boy who cried wolf” nag message in Patentcenter about paying fees.
This is Feature Request FR25. Continue reading “Get rid of or correct or improve the “boy who cried wolf” nag message about paying fees”

Bluesky: @oppedahl.com

Get rid of or correct or improve the “boy who cried wolf” nag message in Patentcenter about paying fees.
This is Feature Request FR25. Continue reading “Get rid of or correct or improve the “boy who cried wolf” nag message about paying fees”

When an ADS turns out to be unsigned, or not correctly signed, or not signed by a practitioner, it leads to a cascade of problems. It often takes months or a lot of money, or both, to fix the problems. It would be trivially easy for Patentcenter to check an uploaded computer-readable Form PTO/AIA/14 (Application Data Sheet) such as we see at right, for a signature. But Patentcenter does not do so.
Patentcenter should check an uploaded ADS for a signature and should display warnings as needed. This is Feature Request FR24. Continue reading “Patentcenter should check uploaded ADS for a signature”

When a filer uploads Form PTO/AIA/14 (Application Data Sheet), Patentcenter should carry out validations. As mentioned here, Patentcenter should validate priority claims against DAS. This blog article points out that Patentcenter should validate the “non-inventor applicant” excuse field.
This is Feature Request FR23.
Continue reading “Patentcenter should validate the “non-inventor applicant” excuse field”
What are the consequences of filing a US patent application with an Application Data Sheet (“ADS”) that was unsigned, or incorrectly signed? Many, many bad things can flow from this. The bad things can cascade and it can take months of tedious step-by-step filings to get things straightened out. Continue reading “Consequences of an unsigned (or incorrectly signed) ADS”
I am delighted to report that the European Union Intellectual Property Office will begin participating in the DAS system as a Depositing Office for industrial designs starting on July 11, 2020. This comes after Eighty-four practitioners and applicants asked EUIPO to join DAS.
For more information see the Notice at the WIPO DAS web site.
By the way, if you are glad to see this result, maybe take a look at the list of the eighty-four signers, and if you know one or more of them, maybe drop them a “thank you”.
Getting a priority claim wrong in a patent application is a serious matter. There’s a super-simple thing that ePCT does to prevent many ways of getting priority claims wrong, that Patentcenter fails to do. Of course Patentcenter should do the same validation that ePCT does — cross-checking against DAS. I’ll explain. Continue reading “Patentcenter should validate priority claims against DAS”

The coders who designed the Patentcenter workbench made a mistake in the “sort by patent number” function. This is listserv trouble ticket number CP33. Continue reading “Patentcenter’s “sort by patent number” does not work correctly”

I bet I got your attention with that title! Nope, I think it is extremely unlikely that whatever the title made you think of has anything at all to do with the feature of USPTO’s Patentcenter that this article is going to talk about. Continue reading “How your reptile brain reacts to an animated image of a throbber”
Readers will recall my recent sense of discouragement with USPTO’s handling of its Patentcenter rollout. But yesterday there was an encouraging event. I think there is some reason for guarded optimism that USPTO may do better going forward in its handling of its Patentcenter rollout. Continue reading “An encouraging step with Patentcenter”
Today is the exciting day! Today is the day that ILPO commences its participation as a Depositing Office and as an Accessing Office for industrial designs in the DAS system. Continue reading “Today is the day for Israel and DAS and industrial designs”