Bluesky: @oppedahl.com
The weather reports for the Washington area call for “six to ten inches of snow” between now and noon on Tuesday. So the USPTO will be formally closed on Tuesday, February 17. This means that if you needed to file something on the 17th to satisfy some USPTO due date, it will be timely if filed on Wednesday the 18th.
Continue reading “USPTO will be closed on Tuesday, February 17”
Just a reminder that the USPTO will be closed on Monday, February 16. This is Washington’s Birthday* which is a federal holiday.
Anything that you might need to do by February 16 to satisfy some USPTO due date may be postponed until Tuesday, February 17 and will still be timely.
Almost daily I will encounter some patent practitioner or patent firm or corporate patent department that uses PCT but that fails to make use of ePCT. Of course when this happens I encourage the patent practitioner or patent firm or corporate patent department to start using ePCT. I imagine this to be a bit like the dentist who encourages people to brush and floss, sometimes feeling discouraged with the realization that some will not follow the advice. Now comes another series of webinars from WIPO explaining how to use ePCT.
(Followup posting here.)
Within our office we try to track our PPH cases pretty carefully. This prompted my recent blog postings here and here and here about the recent substantial worsening of the backlog within the USPTO in considering requests for PPH status. After months of no progress USPTO has managed to grant a few of our long-pending PPH petitions, and so we have some hard data as just now bad the backlog is in recent weeks.
Continue reading “Followup to “PPH Petition Backlog – four months and counting””
(Update: Forty-two Patent Practitioners have written to Director Vidal about this. See blog article.)
Readers of this blog will recall that the Board of Directors of AIPLA adopted a resolution urging the USPTO to give substantial deference in a US national-phase application to the work done earlier by the USPTO in its role as International Searching Authority and International Preliminary Examining Authority. AIPLA then wrote a letter to the USPTO about this. I call this (not AIPLA’s terminology!) inviting the USPTO to “drink its own Champagne”. I blogged about this. What happened next?
Continue reading “Followup to “drinking their own Champagne””
(See more recent blog posting with brochure and registration information.)
AIPLA has set the dates and locations for the Patent Cooperation Treaty seminars that will happen this coming July 2015. Here they are:
Those who have attended AIPLA PCT Seminars in the past know that these seminars are very different from the usual “just the facts” PCT seminar. These seminars have the benefit of spirited interaction among all of the presenters, including experienced patent practitioners from the US and from other countries.
Save the dates on your calendar.
Your blogger will be one of the presenters.
(There is a followup posting.)
On January 26 I blogged here about the earthquake that happened on January 15, in which the Swiss Franc jumped some 30% in value. I talked about how this earthquake affected the World Intellectual Property Organization in Geneva. I mentioned that the legacy approach to currency exchange rate shifts entailed a time lag of as much as three or four months, a time lag that would cost WIPO some millions of dollars. I mentioned that the various patent offices around the world, in their role as PCT Receiving Offices, might or might not choose to accommodate WIPO by implementing new fee amounts sooner. I wrote to USPTO and to EPO to urge them to accommodate WIPO in this way. Here’s what I heard back from those patent offices …
(There is a follow-up posting and another follow-up posting.)
On January 15, 2015 the Swiss Franc rose by about 19
% relative to the US dollar, as shown in this graph (source: XE.com). It’s likely to stay this way for some time. How will this affect filers of PCT patent applications?
Continue reading “Four consecutive Fridays (PCT fees likely to increase in a few weeks)”
In this blog post I will say a few words about what not to do when drafting claims. First a metaphor. Suppose the invention is the one in Harry Nilsson’s song “Coconut“. The first draft of the proposed patent claim, prepared by your new associate, is:
1. A method for treating a bellyache, the method carried out with respect to a lime and a coconut, the method comprising the steps of:
Continue reading “What not to do when drafting claims (lime and coconut)”
(There is a followup posting.)
Let’s say you filed a PCT application and picked the USPTO to be your International Searching Authority. Suppose further that ISA/US decided the claims are patentable. When you enter the US national phase from that PCT application, may you safely assume that the USPTO will allow the application?
Continue reading “Urging USPTO to “drink its own Champagne””