Ghost art unit apparently disbanded

On November 19 I blogged about the “Ghost Art Unit” at the USPTO.  This was art unit 2910, headed by SPEs Cathron Brooks and Joel Sincavage.  This was a curious art unit with no Examiners.  Our firm had some fifteen design patent applications stalled in this art unit.  The cases had no First Office Action Prediction, which was no surprise given that the art unit had no Examiners.  A comment by a USPTO person gave me the impression that a couple of thousand design patent applications, all GUI (graphical user interface) applications, were assigned to this art unit. Continue reading “Ghost art unit apparently disbanded”

A tip of the hat to the TTABlog

Yesterday I was delighted to see that John L. Welch had given a shout-out onClipboard02 his very popular TTABlog to an article in my Ant-like Persistence blog.  This was in his TTABlog Flotsam and Jetsam, Issue No. 15.  If you’ve not already done so, you should subscribe to the TTABlog.  John was doing blogging before it was trendy, for over a decade now, and his blog has probably at least ten times as many followers as mine has.  So it’s very nice and very gracious for him to have linked to my blog.  I estimate that his link brought at least a hundred new viewers to my blog.

On the subject of intellectual property blogs, there are other important blogs that you should subscribe to.  These include the many sponsors of Meet the Bloggers, a moveable feast that has turned up at INTA meetings since the San Diego meeting in 2005.  John has sponsored Meet the Bloggers many times, as have:

I’d guess there will likely be an eleventh annual Meet the Bloggers reception at the INTA meeting in San Diego in 2015.

And of course if you have not already done so, you should subscribe to Dennis Crouch’s Patently-O Blog.

The ® symbol

The alert reader will have already noticed today’s change to the banner above.  The banner now contains the ® symbol next to the words “Ant-like Persistence”.  The banner also contains a photograph (taken by yours truly) that shows some of the mountains nearby to our office in Summit County, Colorado.

Continue reading “The ® symbol”

Picking a wifi hot spot – 5 GHz band

If you are a frequent traveler you know that it is a life-changing event to start carrying a wifi hot spot with you.  I count it as a necessity.  I have had a dozen mobile data devices over the past fifteen years or so.  Years ago the way to connect was by means of a plug-in card in your notebook computer.  Nowadays the smart way to go is a wifi hot spot.  The hot spot provides wifi for your notebook computer, for your tablet, for your smart phone, and if you are traveling with co-workers, it provides wifi for your co-workers’ devices as well.

Many hotels gouge their guests with charges of $10 or even $15 or $20 per night for internet service.  Some of them charge this fee a second or third time per night for your second or third device. zte01  Even in a hotel that (nicely) does not charge for the wifi you can occasionally have a bad night that the hotel’s wifi is not working well or at all.

When you are in an airport, you may find that the “free” wifi in the airport is very slow, or only works for so many minutes and then they expect you to pay to keep using it.

The monthly fee that you pay for a wifi hot spot can pay for itself during just a single out-of-town trip.

A wifi hot spot can make an intercity train ride much more productive.

If you do international travel, as I often do, the usual worry with international data usage is the fear that you could return to the US and receive a bill for thousands of dollars.  The way to avoid this risk is to use prepaid international data such as AT&T’s Buyasession program, loaded into a wifi hot spot, and then configure your smart phone and notebook computer and tablet to draw their data only from wifi and not from the local phone company.

The point of this blog posting is to tell you about a particular wifi hot spot that has served me well lately, and that has a particular feature that I have not seen in other wifi hot spots.

Continue reading “Picking a wifi hot spot – 5 GHz band”

Adopting a digital wallet

nfc-logo(Here is a follow-on article.)

I finally decided to try out a digital wallet system.  By this we mean a system that uses an NFC (near field communications) radio link to pay at a store.  You can recognize which stores are equipped for NFC payments by looking for this logo (right).

Of course the digital wallet system that is all over the media lately is Apple Pay, which works only with certain very recently released models of iPhones.

It turns out that Apple Pay is the johnny-come-lately to the NFC party.  Other companies have been offering NFC payment systems (digital wallets) for over a year now. These systems that have been around for over a year do not require you to have an iPhone.

Continue reading “Adopting a digital wallet”

USPTO’s backlog of undecided PPH petition worsens

(Follow-up postings are here and here and here.)

Last month I blogged about USPTO’s backlog of undecided PPH petitions.  These are the petitions in cases where the applicant is asking the USPTO to place a patent application on the Patent Prosecution Highway because the application has already been found patentable in some other patent office.

USPTO’s internal standard is to rule upon such a petition within two months of when it was filed.  When I blogged about this last month, we had petitions filed as long ago as August 26, 2014 that had not yet been decided.  By now we have over a dozen PPH petitions that were filed more than three months ago and remain outstanding as of today.  The August 26 petition remains outstanding.  The backlog is worsening.

How old is your oldest PPH petition that has not yet been decided?

Getting out of the ghost art unit at the USPTO

Well, one of our oldest design patent applications, one that had been parked in the “ghost art unit” for some seven months, is now out of the ghost art unit.  Just today it got transferred to art unit 2911, and after some seven months without a First Office Action Prediction (“FOAP”), it again has an FOAP.

The FOAP is six months, that is, USPTO now estimates that it will examine this case in about June of 2015.

USPTO’s First Office Action Estimator says that for a newly filed application in art unit 2911, the estimated time for a newly filed design patent application to get a first office action is 13 months from now.

What’s weird about this is that our application was filed September 23, 2013.  With a backlog of 13 months, this would suggest our application should have been examined in about October of 2013.  Over a month ago.  Our seven months in the ghost art unit seem to have pushed this application back in the queue so that it will get examined much later than it should have.

Well you take what you can get.  At least this application is now back in the normal Examining Corps and after some seven months of being unable to do so, we can once again track its progress through the system.

We have over a dozen other design patent applications that were filed more recently than this one, that are still parked in the ghost art unit.  We will continue to keep an eye on them and hopefully they too will eventually be transferred to a real art unit.