What is the device shown in the photograph at right? My quick answer, and you might say the same thing, is that it is “an EV charger”. But my quick answer is wrong. The device shown at right is a mere “EVSE”, not an “EV charger”. This fact, it turns out, explains why a Hyundai Kona charges at a mere 26 miles per hour, when plugged into this 48-amp device, instead of as much as 42 or 43 miles per hour the way some other EV might do. See a blog article about this.
Which GL.iNet routers provide VLAN wifi client isolation?
The question presented (and answered) here is “which GL.iNet routers provide VLAN wifi client isolation?” This is likely to be of interest to those who want to set up VLAN protection in their home or small office local area network. The idea would be to relegate relatively untrusted IOT (internet-of-things) devices to a separate VLAN from the main VLAN of trusted devices, but in addition, to isolate the untrusted IOT wifi clients from each other. On this page you can see the results of my actual testing as to which GL.iNet routers provide this isolation feature, and which do not.
Today is the day — Lithuanian patent office and the DAS system
Today is the day that the State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania becomes even more trendy, modern and up-to-date. Today is the date that the Lithuanian patent office commences participation in the DAS system in four ways:
-
- as a Depositing Office for purposes of national industrial design applications,
- as a Depositing Office for purposes of national trademark applications,
- as an Accessing Office for purposes of national industrial design applications, and
- as an Accessing Office for purposes of national trademark applications.
You heard this exciting news from me first, in my blog posting of May 4, 2023.
The Lithuanian patent office has already been a participant in the DAS system since January 1, 2023 in these ways:
-
- as a Depositing Office for purposes of national patent applications;
- as an Accessing Office for purposes of national patent applications; and
- as an Accessing Office for purposes of PCT patent applications.
The two-letter code (ISO-3166 code) for this Office is “LT”. The web site of the Lithuanian patent office may be seen here.
Replace all four tires?
Many owners of all-wheel-drive vehicles have had it drummed into their heads that if you find the need to replace one tire, the only correct way to proceed is to replace all four tires. But if your vehicle is a “dual motor” EV, that’s wrong. You can get away with replacing just two tires. See blog article.
July 4 a holiday at the USPTO
Tuesday, July 4, 2023 will be a federal holiday in the District of Columbia. This means that the USPTO will be closed that day.
This means that any response that would normally be due on Tuesday, July 4 will be timely if made by Wednesday, July 5.
Note the important comment below from alert reader Dan Ferris:
It’s important to note that the “next business day” rule does not apply to the copendency requirement for filing divisional/continuation applications. Any such applications with parent applications issuing on July 4, 2023 should be filed no later than July 4, 2023.
The Osborne Effect and Tesla superchargers
Four car makers (Ford, General Motors, Rivian, and now Volvo) have announced that starting about a year from now, their newly manufactured EVs will have a charging port that permits charging at Tesla supercharging stations. This will doubtless trigger the Osborne Effect (blog article).
Volunteers sought for coding a PHP registration status monitor for VOIP.MS
Update! I now have a status monitor working. See blog article.
VOIP.MS is my preferred service provider for VOIP telephone service. I am looking for one or two PHP coders to join me in constructing a PHP status monitor for monitoring the registration status of SIP trunks provided by VOIP.MS. Continue reading “Volunteers sought for coding a PHP registration status monitor for VOIP.MS”
False statement about DOCX returns to USPTO web site
It will be recalled (blog article, May 30, 2023) that on May 28, 203, the USPTO had posted a false statement on the USPTO web site. The USPTO said:
The USPTO strongly recommends submitting Specification, Claims, and/or Abstract in DOCX format which provides better data accuracy.
On May 29, a listserv member posted the question “Isn’t this false advertising or improper legal advice?” and a few hours later, the false statement disappeared from the USPTO web site.
Now on June 19, 2023, the false statement has quietly returned to the USPTO web site. Quoted above is a screen shot taken on June 19, 2023 from USPTO’s Patentcenter web site. Continue reading “False statement about DOCX returns to USPTO web site”
One reason why USPTO’s DOCX initiative presents professional liability risks
One of the many reasons why the USPTO’s DOCX initiative presents professional liability risks arises from USPTO’s use of an ever-changing “black box engine” to render DOCX files into PDF files. The black box engine is by now up to at least version 19. Continue reading “One reason why USPTO’s DOCX initiative presents professional liability risks”
Another submission to the CAFC on “where you sleep at night”
It will be recalled that there is an appeal pending before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on “where you sleep at night”. Many months ago, the USPTO had filed a brief in that appeal, representing to the Court that it was protecting the “where you sleep at night” domicile addresses of trademark applicants from exposure to the public. And it will be recalled that recently the USPTO revealed that for more than three years, it had failed to protect the “where you sleep at night” domicile addresses of applicants from exposure to the public, despite having promised to do so. In other words, the representation in that brief was untrue. The Associate Solicitor of the USPTO wrote a letter to the CAFC that sort of admitted this (blog article).
Now the appellant has filed a letter response. You can see it here. It is interesting reading.