An Office Action in the red-hair-and-tinsel trademark case

Now there is an Office Action in the red-hair-and-tinsel trademark application (previous blog article).  You can see the TSDR page and the Office Action.  The Examining Attorney gives several bases for refusal:

    • Does not function as a service mark
    • Non-distinctive trade dress
    • Specimen refusal – fails to directly associate mark with services
    • Mark on drawing differs from mark on specimen

2 Replies to “An Office Action in the red-hair-and-tinsel trademark case”

  1. While certainly a welcome action, one must wonder from “there is also a public policy consideration with allowing an individual to claim ownership of a human’s immutable characteristics” whether the Examining Attorney truly believes that tinsel in one’s hair is an “immutable” characteristic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *