Bluesky: @oppedahl.com
What goes up must come down, it seems.
| USD search fee as of December 31, 2016 | As of January 1, 2017 | % increase | March 1, 2017 | % decrease | |
| ISA/EP | $2097 | $2103 | 0.3% | $1992 | 5.3% |
| ISA/KR | $1120 | $1177 | 5.1% | $1114 | 5.4% |
| ISA/JP | $1530 | $1536 | 0.4% | $1372 | 10.7% |
Continue reading “Some PCT search fees to drop on March 1, 2017”
Ever since March 16, 2013 there has been a profound asymmetry in the manner in which check-the-box mistakes could be corrected by the practitioner. For more than three years now, it has been easy (according to USPTO’s rules) to correct a mistake if it happens in one direction, and impossible to correct the mistake if it happens in the opposite direction. USPTO has now announced a policy that is intended to reduce this profound asymmetry. Continue reading “USPTO addresses asymmetry in the correction of check-the-box mistakes”
I’ve received my first status monitoring results from USPTO’s new TAD (Trademark Application Docket) system. The system worked, so far as I can tell. I’ll describe how it went. Continue reading “First results from USPTO’s Trademark Application Docket system”
The USPTO has quietly released a new way to monitor the trademark Official Gazette. (Note that this is not at all the same thing as the trademark application monitoring system that I discussed in the previous blog article! This blog article is talking about a system for monitoring the Official Gazette, and the previous blog article is talking about a system for monitoring TSDR.)
Continue reading “A new way to monitor the trademark Official Gazette”
The USPTO has quietly rolled out a new system that permits users to monitor the status of trademark filings. The USPTO’s new system has a few features in common with Feathers!, the well-known software for monitoring US trademark filings. I hope trademark practitioners will give the USPTO’s new system a try and post comments below, to report their experience.
Continue reading “A new way to monitor US trademark filings”
A year ago I published the 2015 Utility Patent Toteboard. Now it’s time to finalize and publish the 2016 Utility Patent Toteboard.
The goal of this toteboard is to list the firms that helped clients to obtain US utility patents in 2016. It will rank the firms according to the number of US utility patents obtained. Respondents are asked to report only US utility patents for which the firm is listed on the front page of the granted patent. Please respond by January 20, 2017.
To respond, click here.
It’s that time of year again. A year ago we published the 2015 US Trademark Registration Tote Board. Now it’s time to get the numbers in for the 2016 US Trademark Registration Tote Board.
The goal of this toteboard is to list the firms that helped clients obtain US trademark registrations in 2016. The toteboard seeks to list US trademark registrations granted in 2016. The closing date for the questionnaire will be January 20, 2017.
To learn more and to report your numbers, please click here.
A year ago I published the 2015 Design Patent Toteboard. Now it’s time to finalize and publish the 2016 Design Patent Toteboard.
The goal of this toteboard is to list the firms that helped clients to obtain US design patents in 2016. It will rank the firms according to the number of US design patents obtained. Respondents are asked to report only US design patents for which the firm is listed on the front page of the granted patent. Please respond by January 15, 2017.
To respond, click here.
As a reminder, many PCT searching authorities will have fee changes taking effect today. You can read about them in my blog posting from a month ago.
Now and again we will receive instructions from a client (or foreign patent firm) to incur no further expense in a particular patent application. In such a patent application, what sometimes happens later is that we receive an Office Action. This prompted me to share a few thoughts about whether the applicant should file an Express Abandonment in such a case.
Continue reading “Why aren’t there more express abandonments?”